Printmaster Landmark · 2023
The Zone of Interest
Directed by Jonathan Glazer
Domestic routine occupies the image while an extermination camp persists in sound beyond the wall; what is heard cannot be made harmless by remaining unseen.
- Countries
- United Kingdom · Poland · United States
- Languages
- German · Polish · Yiddish
- Runtime
- 105 minutes
Printmaster editorial
Why it matters
The film’s governing idea is a division of attention. The camera remains with Rudolf Höss and his family while the extermination camp next door is built as a continuous off-screen reality. Sound is not illustration here: it supplies the film the image refuses to provide. The wall separates spaces, but it cannot keep one reality from entering the other.
That division makes listening an ethical act. Domestic detail—footsteps, crockery, children, birds, water—does not soften what is heard beyond the frame. It shows how atrocity can be absorbed into routine. Distance is carefully judged: events remain geographically credible and often acoustically ordinary, which makes the family’s sustained inattention more disturbing than a conventional horror crescendo.
The form was constructed as two films. Johnnie Burn’s team completed the domestic world before introducing the researched camp soundtrack, preserving the independence of each layer. Jonathan Glazer’s phrase ‘the film you see’ and ‘the film you hear’ is therefore more than a metaphor; it describes the production method as well as the audience’s experience.
Mica Levi’s music enters rarely and under a different set of rules. Its voices, falling pitches and electronic ruptures do not score the family’s emotions. They open and close the film, interrupt its apparent naturalism and expose a register that realistic sound alone cannot contain. The soundtrack’s authorship crosses the usual borders between production recording, editorial construction, effects, mixing and score.
Verified process
How the two films were built
A domestic world recorded from within
Glazer used as many as ten concealed cameras at once and allowed takes to run for up to an hour. With no boom operators moving through the live set, Tarn Willers and his team mapped almost fifty possible microphone positions across the house and garden. Cabled microphones were suspended from ceilings, plant microphones were concealed, and actors also wore radio microphones where possible. The aim was not simply clean dialogue, but a detailed, natural acoustic life.
Fact / process Tarn Willers, IATSE Local 695 ↗
An unseen world researched before post
Burn was given roughly a year to research and record what the camp layer would require. He consulted survivor testimony, historical writing, photographs and drawings, then organised the work in a document of about 600 pages. Recordings were chosen and positioned according to event, language, distance and reflective surfaces so that the horror would register as an adjacent physical reality rather than a generalized collage.
Fact / process Bryan Abrams / Motion Picture Association ↗
Music kept outside conventional scoring
Levi sent an early musical idea in 2016 and later spent a year in the studio with Glazer and editor Paul Watts. Many approaches were tested and discarded because music interfered with the realistic density of the sound design. The remaining material operates structurally—especially over black screens and in the night passages—rather than continually steering emotion.
Fact / process Sophia Satchell-Baeza / BFI Sight and Sound ↗
Close listening
Listen for
- Two simultaneous filmsNotice how the domestic foreground remains coherent while another narrative continues beyond the wall.
- Distance as evidenceGunshots, machinery, trains, voices and dogs are scaled and reflected as events in a neighbouring geography, not pushed forward as spectacle.
- Competing realitiesListen to family conversation, play and garden sounds continuing without yielding to the camp layer.
- The house itselfFootsteps, crockery, doors, plumbing and room tone give the visible world a mundane physical credibility.
- Nature without innocenceBirds, insects, frogs, river and garden life coexist with industrial and human violence; ambience does not become consolation.
- Changes of proximityThe soundtrack alters with position in the house and garden, making the wall an acoustic boundary that is never fully sealed.
- Restraint and ruptureLong passages avoid conventional score; music and abstraction arrive as formal breaks rather than emotional underlining.
- The black screenAt the beginning and end, image withdraws and listening becomes the primary way the film directs attention.
Close listening · One sequence
Two realities share the garden
The Höss family's exterior domestic scenes
The visible scene offers sunlight, conversation, children and cultivated space. The soundtrack refuses that frame as the whole reality: engines, industry, commands, gunfire and human suffering persist at changing distances beyond the wall.
- Do not wait for a cueThe camp is not introduced only at dramatic moments. Its continuity is the point.
- Competing attentionDomestic detail remains intelligible while distant events make innocence impossible; neither layer politely clears space for the other.
- Distance without safetyScale and perspective locate violence beyond the garden without allowing physical separation to become moral separation.
What it teaches: Off-screen sound can contradict the limits of an image and make selective attention itself the subject of a film.
No timecode is given because editions and distributor idents vary. Locate the sequence by description.
Verified quotations
In their words
“There are, in effect, two films: the one you see, and the one you hear.”
“We thought of it as two films: the film you see and hear in the house and the film you hear over the camp wall.”
“It felt like my job was almost the opposite, with Jon keen for us to capture every detail no matter how seemingly mundane.”
“It couldn’t just work on a subliminal level; it had to be technical rather than emotive.”
Research & close listening
Recording a house as a live performance space
Production sound mixer Tarn Willers describes a shoot with ten cameras running together, concealed equipment and actors free to move without conventional marks. Boom operators could not follow them through the visible sets. His team planned almost fifty microphone positions around the house, moving the available microphones to suit each day’s scenes rather than installing fifty microphones at once. Suspended wired microphones and hidden plant microphones captured household detail as well as speech. Willers’s account distinguishes this domestic location recording from the later construction of the camp soundscape: the two layers had different production histories.
Read the source Local 695 · Tarn Willers on location recording ↗
A listening exercise
Printmaster editorial · A prompt for your own analysis
Choose a domestic scene and make two columns: sounds linked to visible activity and sounds arriving from beyond the frame. Mark moments when your attention shifts even though the camera does not. Consider what the family acknowledges and what the audience is asked to acknowledge.
Seminar question: How does the persistence of ordinary activity affect your response to the sounds beyond the wall?
People and roles
The sound team
Sonic authorship
- Johnnie BurnSound designer · supervising sound editor · re-recording mixer
- Tarn WillersProduction sound mixer
- Mica LeviComposer
Production sound
- Mateusz StasiakFirst assistant sound
- James OgdenSound mix technician
- Filip SulimaUtility sound technician
Sound editorial
- Simon CarrollSound effects editor
- Max BehrensSound effects editor
- Joe MountSound effects editor
- Brendan FeeneySound effects editor
Foley
- Ewa MazurkiewiczFoley editor
- Natalia LubowieckaFoley editor
- Dawid KoneckiFoley editor
- Kamil KwiatkowskiFoley editor
- Jacek WiśniewskiFoley artist
Roles above are assembled from the MPSE nomination roster, Tarn Willers’s first-person production account, Halo Post’s facility credit and published production-credit records. They document the principal credited and award-recognised sound team, not every uncredited contribution.
Recognition for sound
Different awards, different maps of the work
The pattern is more useful than a total. The Academy and BAFTA condensed the achievement to Burn and Willers; AMPS recognised a five-person production-and-post team; MPSE named editors and Foley practitioners across the wider construction. London and Los Angeles critics joined Levi and Burn in hybrid music/sound categories. Together the records show a soundtrack whose authorship resists a single conventional box.
Major wins
Craft awards
Association of Motion Picture Sound
Excellence in Sound for a Feature Film
Music+Sound Awards International
Best Sound Design in a Feature Film
Critics awards
London Critics’ Circle Film Awards
Technical Achievement of the Year — music and sound
Los Angeles Film Critics Association
Best Music / Score — special recognition of Johnnie Burn’s contribution
San Diego Film Critics Society
Best Sound Design
Nominations / finalists
Motion Picture Sound Editors — Golden Reel Awards
Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing — Foreign Language Feature
Other significant recognition
Connections
Continue through sound
Connections are labelled: comparisons are Printmaster editorial, not claims that one film directly influenced another.
Provenance
Sources
Facts, roles and quotations on this page are linked to named records. “Why it matters” and “Listen for” are Printmaster editorial.
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The 96th Academy Awards — winners and nominees ↗ 10 March 2024 · Used for: Best Sound result and recipients.
- BAFTA. Film / Sound — awards database ↗ 2024 · Used for: BAFTA Sound result and recipients.
- Commission Supérieure Technique. CST Award for Best Artist-Technician ↗ 2023 · Used for: Cannes craft award and credited discipline.
- European Film Academy. The Zone of Interest — European Film Awards record ↗ 2023 · Used for: European Sound result and recipients.
- Association of Motion Picture Sound. AMPS Awards 2024 — feature film ↗ 2024 · Used for: AMPS result and five named recipients.
- Motion Picture Sound Editors. 71st Golden Reel Awards nominees and winners ↗ 2024 · Used for: Sound editorial and Foley nomination roster.
- Polish Film Academy. Orły 2025 laureates ↗ 10 March 2025 · Used for: Polish Film Award for Best Sound.
- Cannes Soundtrack. Winner 2023 — Mica Levi ↗ 2023 · Used for: Cannes Soundtrack Award.
- Tarn Willers / IATSE Local 695. The Film You See: Capturing Location Sound on The Zone of Interest ↗ 2024 · Used for: First-person production workflow, microphones and roles.
- Bryan Abrams / Motion Picture Association. Creating the Soundscape From Hell ↗ 18 January 2024 · Used for: Research period, two-film method and spatial construction.
- Sophia Satchell-Baeza / BFI Sight and Sound. Mica Levi on their The Zone of Interest score ↗ 14 August 2024 · Used for: Music development, quotation and sound/score boundary.
- Sean O’Hagan / The Observer. Jonathan Glazer: ‘The film we watch is about us’ ↗ 10 December 2023 · Used for: Glazer quotation and formal concept.
- Halo Post. The Zone of Interest — facility credits ↗ 2023 · Used for: Post-production roles and mixing facility.
- Los Angeles Film Critics Association. 2023 Awards ↗ 2023 · Used for: Music/score award and special sound-design recognition.
- The Guardian. The Zone of Interest triumphs at London Critics’ Circle Awards ↗ 4 February 2024 · Used for: Technical Achievement award for music and sound.
- Music+Sound Awards. 2024 International winners ↗ 2024 · Used for: Sound-design award and credited team.